Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Powers v. Hougas et al
as 4:2015cv04056
Defendant:
Sally Hougas, Gregg Scott, Joseph Hankins and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Powers v. Wexford Health Services, et al
as 15-1426
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES and PAUL TALBOT, Doctor
Powers v. Clayton et al
as 3:2014cv03306
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
James Christopher Clayton, Joseph Hankins, Gregg Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Lochard et al
as 3:2014cv03262
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Hugh Lochard and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Scott et al
as 3:2014cv03201
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Eric Kunkel, Steve Dredge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Scott et al
as 3:2014cv03148
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Danielle Walker and Paul Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc
as 3:2014cv03061
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Powers v. Salvador Godinez, et al
as 13-2579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, GLADYS TAYLOR, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, MICHAEL P. RANDLE, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Powers v. Lochard et al
as 3:2013cv03134
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Hugh Lochard, Michael Bednarz, Wexford Health Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powers v. Hankins et al
as 3:2013cv03097
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Joseph Hankins, James Christopher Clayton, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
