Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Shapard v. Attea
as 19-922
Defendant / Appellee:
John Attea, Correction Officer, Edwin Mendez, Correction Officer and Robert Kyle, Correction Officer
Defendant:
Anthony Zon, Superintendent, Al Herdzik, Lieutenant, Donald Selsky, Director, Special Housing Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Shapard
Shapard v. Attea
as 16-3764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Shapard
Defendant - Appellee:
John Attea, Correction Officer, Edwin Mendez, Correction Officer, Robert Kyle, Correction Officer and others
Holland v. Goord
as 13-2694
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darryl Holland
Defendant - Appellee:
Glenn S. Goord, in his individual capacity, Anthony F. Zon, in both his individual and official capacity as former Superintendent, Wende Correctional Facility, Thomas Schoellkopf, in both his individual and official capacity as Hearing Officer, Wende Correctional Facility and others
Tafari v. Selsky et al
as 1:2012cv00374
Plaintiff:
Injah Tafari
Defendant:
Donald Selsky, Thomas Schoellkopf, G. Monahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice v. Miraglia
as 11-3163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John D. Justice
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Miraglia, Merrill Rotter, Dr., M. William Boller, Hon. and others
Justice v. Miraglia et al
as 6:2011cv06246
Plaintiff:
John D. Justice
Defendant:
Richard Miraglia, Merrill Rotter, M. William Boller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shapard v. Attea
as 10-525
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Shapard
Defendant:
Al Herdzik, Lieutenant, Martin Kearney, Captain, Anthony Zon, Superintendent and others
Defendant - Appellee:
John Attea, Correction Officer, Edwin Mendez, Correction Officer, Robert Kyle, Correction Officer and others
Shapard v. Attea et al
as 6:2008cv06146
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shapard
Defendant:
John Attea, Edwin Mendez, Robert Kyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
