Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Thomas Richey v. R. Starks, et al
as 20-35010
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES KORUS, Corrections Specialist II, Department of Corrections, RICHARD GEER, Custody Unit Supervisor, Monroe Correctional Complex and R. J. STARKS, Intelligence and Investigation Officer, Monroe Correctional Complex
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS W.S. RICHEY
John Doe v. Starks et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01446
Defendant: Charles Korus, RJ Starks and Richard Geer
Plaintiff: Thomas W.S. Richey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richey v. Stemler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00769
Defendant: Lee Stemler
Plaintiff: Thomas W.S. Richey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Richey v. Joni Aiyeku, et al
as 19-35076
Defendant / Appellee: K. WALKER, Grievance Coordinator, JONI AIYEKU, Grievance Coordinator and L. YOUNG, Grievance Coordinator
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS W.S. RICHEY
Thomas Richey v. Mike Obenland
as 17-35430
Petitioner: THOMAS W.S. RICHEY
Respondent: MIKE OBENLAND
Thomas Richey v. Joni Aiyeku We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35298
Plaintiff - Appellee: THOMAS W.S. RICHEY
Defendant - Appellant: JONI AIYEKU
Thomas Richey v. D. Dahne We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35032
Plaintiff - Appellee: THOMAS W.S. RICHEY
Defendant - Appellant: D. DAHNE
Thomas Richey v. Roy Gonzalez, et al
as 14-35775
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS W.S. RICHEY
Defendant - Appellee: ROY GONZALEZ, D. BAKER and STEVEN FLEENOR
Thomas Richey v. Sandra Dimmel
as 14-70149
Petitioner: THOMAS W.S. RICHEY
Respondent: SANDRA DIMMEL
Thomas Richey v. Mike Obenland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-35830
Petitioner - Appellant: THOMAS W.S. RICHEY
Respondent - Appellee: MIKE OBENLAND, Superintendent, Clallam Bay Corrections Center

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?