Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
THORNE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv00282
Plaintiff: ANGELA THORNE
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Antowan Thorne
as 14-3085
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant - Appellant: Antowan Thorne, also known as Anthony Thorne
Franklin Reaves, et al v. Black Farmers Assoc. Settle, et al
as 12-5313
Plaintiff - Appellee: Franklin C. Reaves, Roger Arnold, Cassandra Graham and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Sarah Simon-Arnold, Reverend
Defendant - Appellee: Black Farmers Association Settlement Administrator and EPIQ Class Action & Claims Solutions, Inc.
REAVES et al v. BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00955
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN C. REAVES, SARAH SIMON-ARNOLD, ROGER ARNOLD and others
Defendant: BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00011
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SQM NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION et al v. CITY OF POMONA
as 1:2011mc00562
Respondent: CITY OF POMONA
Petitioner: SQM NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and JOHN THORNE
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
SQM NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION et al v. CITY OF LINDSAY
as 1:2011mc00563
Petitioner: SQM NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and JOHN THORNE
Respondent: CITY OF LINDSAY
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
THORNE v. USA
as 1:2010cv01608
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: ANTOWAN THORNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00184
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Civil Rights None
USA v. Antowan Thorne
as 08-3109
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant - Appellant: Antowan Thorne, also known as Anthony Thorne

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?