Cases 1 - 10 of 12
RecepTrexx LLC v. TiVo Corporation
as 1:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
RecepTrexx LLC
Defendant:
TiVo Corporation and TiVo Platform Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. TiVo Corporation
as 1:2021cv00393
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
TiVo Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Virentem Ventures, LLC v. TiVo Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00787
Defendant:
Xperi Holding Corporation and TiVo Corporation
Plaintiff:
Virentem Ventures, LLC and Virentem Ventures, LLC doing business as Enounce
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Rosenblatt v. TiVo Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00327
Defendant:
Dan Moloney, James E. Meyer, Alan L. Earhart and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
GOTHAM DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv03647
Defendant:
VIEWSTER AG, EPIX ENTERTAINMENT LLC, TIVO CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
GOTHAM DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Adiona IP, LLC v. TiVo Corporation
as 1:2018cv00670
Plaintiff:
Adiona IP, LLC
Defendant:
TiVo Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. et al v. TIVO, INC.
as 2:2013mc00017
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. and GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
Defendant:
TIVO, INC.
Counter_claimant:
TIVO INC.
Cross_defendant:
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.
Counter_defendant:
TIME WARNER CABLE INC. and TIME WARNER CABLE LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
TiVo Inc. v. Verizon Communications Inc.
as 1:2012mc00090
Plaintiff:
TiVo Inc.
Defendant:
Verizon Communications Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Motorola Mobility Inc. et al v. TiVo Inc.
as 1:2012mc00035
Defendant:
TiVo Inc.
Plaintiff:
Motorola Mobility Inc. and General Instrument Corp.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Digital CBT LLC v. TiVo Inc.
as 1:2011cv00917
Plaintiff:
Digital CBT LLC
Defendant:
TiVo Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
