Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Tiggs v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Tavorris Tiggs
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tiggs v. Warden
as 4:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Tavorris Tiggs
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Scherer et al
as 6:2023cv02382
Defendant:
Ronald E. Scherer, Sr., United States of America, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Scherer v. United States of America et al
as 6:2023cv02383
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Scherer, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Tiggs v. Slater et al
as 3:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Tavorris Tiggs
Defendant:
Julia Slater, Clifford Rhoades and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiggs v. Slater et al
as 4:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Tavorris Tiggs
Defendant:
Julia Slater and Clifford Rhoades
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TIGGS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26449
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY TIGGS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TIGG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM K TIGG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
