Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Young v. Garland et al
as 9:2023cv01387
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Michael Horowitz, Dept. of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle Young v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv05238
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Michael Horowitz, Dept. of HHS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Department of Justice
as 9:2021cv00582
Respondent:
Department of Justice
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. United States et al
as 1:2021cv00908
Defendant:
United States, Department of Justice and US Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. United States
as 9:2019cv00822
Defendant:
United States
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Sessions
as 1:2018cv07880
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Sessions et al
as 9:2018cv00829
Defendant:
United States, Department of Justice and Jeff Sessions
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Sessions et al
as 1:2018cv03933
Respondent:
Judicial Conference Committee, United States, Judicial Council Second Circuit and others
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv02171
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. Counselor Madison et al
as 1:2008cv01622
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Counselor Madison, Unit Manager Collins, Deborah A. Locke and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
