Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Avalos v. Bukowski et al
as 2:2014cv02049
Plaintiff:
Carlos Avalos and Jermaine Brooks
Defendant:
Timothy F Bukowski, Michael D Downey, Chad Kolitwenzew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Bukowski et al
as 1:2014cv01788
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee
Defendant:
Timothy F Bukowski, Michael D. Downey, Chad Kolitwenzew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Chief Downey et al
as 2:2013cv02268
Plaintiff:
Mike D Russell
Defendant:
Downey, Kolowenzew, Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Downey et al
as 2:2013cv02239
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Gilmore
Defendant:
Chief Downey, Timothy F Bukowski, Tom Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Downey et al
as 1:2013cv06379
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Gilmore
Defendant:
Chief Downey, Timothy F Bukowski, Tom Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Downey et al
as 1:2013cv06380
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Gilmore
Defendant:
Chief Downey, Timothy F Bukowski, Tom Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becerra v. Dart et al
as 2:2013cv02163
Plaintiff:
Cesar Becerra
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Maureese, Timothy F Bukowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Riley et al
as 2:2013cv02156
Plaintiff:
Gerald Johnson
Defendant:
. Riley, . Ahramovich, . Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodge Jr v. Bukowski et al
as 2:2013cv02125
Plaintiff:
Roderic T Hodge Jr
Defendant:
Timothy F Bukowski, Michael D Downey, Chad Kolitwenzew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leyva v. Bukowski et al
as 2:2013cv02123
Plaintiff:
Giovanni Leyva
Defendant:
Timothy F Bukowski, Michael D Downey, Schlendorf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
