Cases 11 - 20 of 75
OROPALLO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15229
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JAMES OROPALLO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROHWEDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07626
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JAMES ROHWEDER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WINSKER v. EDMONDS et al
as 1:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JAMES WINSKER
Defendant:
VINCENT EDMONDS, ARTRAL ARMSTRONG, CARROL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARNEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65660
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JAMES ARNEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRYANT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62618
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JAMES BRYANT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALEXANDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59709
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JAMES ALEXANDER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POORE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50049
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JAMES POORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROHWEDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49718
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JAMES ROHWEDER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. Desantis et al
as 2:2021cv00613
Plaintiff:
Timothy James
Defendant:
Ron Desantis, Amira D. Fox and Kathleen A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38045
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JAMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
