Cases 1 - 10 of 10
TINSLEY v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2019cv01206
Respondent:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, MR. LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF: PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
RUSSELL A. TINSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tinsley v. Bittenbender
as 3:2016cv02505
Plaintiff:
Theodore Tinsley
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FAGAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03237
Plaintiff:
TINSLEY FAGAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Tinsley v. Perdue
as 3:2015cv01296
Petitioner:
Theodore Tinsley
Respondent:
R.A. Perdue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TINSLEY et al v. SANTIAGO et al
as 2:2013cv07474
Petitioner:
RUSSELL TINSLEY and COMMONWEALTH
Respondent:
SANTIAGO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, RUSSELL TINSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TINSLEY v. MAZZOLA et al
as 2:2011cv06408
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. MAZZOLA, GREGORY E. SMITH, DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TINSLEY v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2011cv06174
Petitioner:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Respondent:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TINSLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2008cv00313
Plaintiff:
THEODORE TINSLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
TINSLEY v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2007cv01701
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant:
ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TINSLEY v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2007cv01661
Petitioner:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Respondent:
ADAMS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
