Cases 11 - 20 of 125
Sanders v. Toby
as 1:2022cv03606
Petitioner:
Torrence Sanders
Respondent:
Annettia Toby and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Toby et al
as 1:2022cv02947
Petitioner:
Brandon Jones
Respondent:
Annetia Toby and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TEBOE v. TOBY
as 1:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
MATTHEW ANDREW TEBOE
Respondent:
Annettia Toby
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TEBOE v. TOBY
as 5:2022cv00216
Petitioner:
MATTHEW ANDREW TEBOE
Respondent:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCDANIEL v. TOBY
as 5:2022cv00198
Petitioner:
STEPHEN MARK MCDANIEL
Respondent:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETERS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
DELMON RICKAY PETERS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, UNIT MANAGER CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and COUNSELOR J JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRANT v. TOBY et al
as 5:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
DAYVON GRANT
Defendant:
WARDEB ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN DEREK HILL, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE IVY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNN v. TOBY
as 1:2022cv01063
Petitioner:
DARIUS JARRELL DUNN
Respondent:
Annette Toby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUNN v. TOBY
as 5:2022cv00108
Petitioner:
DARIUS JARRELL DUNN
Respondent:
ANNETTE TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARNES v. TOBY
as 5:2022cv00043
Petitioner:
DONALD GENE BARNES
Respondent:
UNNAMED WARDEN and WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
