Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Delollis v. Friedberg, Smith & Co PC
as 13-1628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Delollis, in his capacity as Trustee, Tom Holsman, in his capacity as Trustee, Empire State Carpenters Welfare Fund and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Friedberg, Smith & Co PC
Delollis et al v. The Marco Consulting Group
as 2:2013cv02421
Plaintiff:
John Delollis, Tom Holsman, Douglas McCarron and others
Defendant:
The Marco Consulting Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
DeLollis et al v. D'Hont et al
as 2:2013cv01870
Defendant:
Gerard M. D'Hont, John Fuchs, David Haines and others
Plaintiff:
John DeLollis, Tom Holsman, Douglas McCarron and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
DeLollis et al v. Friedberg Smith CO., P.C.
as 1:2012mc00840
Interested Party:
Robert Archer and Archer, Byington, Glennon & Levine, LLP
Plaintiff:
John DeLollis and Tom Holsman
Defendant:
Friedberg Smith CO., P.C.
Delollis et al v. Investment Performance Services, LLC
as 2:2012cv02764
Plaintiff:
John Delollis, Tom Holsman, Douglas McCarron and others
Defendant:
Investment Performance Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Delollis et al v. Banfield et al
as 2:2012cv02332
Defendant:
William Banfield, James Bodrato, Thomas Burke and others
Plaintiff:
John Delollis, Tom Holsman, Douglas McCarron and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Delollis et al v. Fuchs et al
as 2:2012cv02331
Plaintiff:
John Delollis, Tom Holsman, Douglas McCarron and others
Defendant:
John Fuchs, Earl Hall, Lloyd Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
DeLollis et al v. Friedberg, Smith & Co PC
as 3:2012cv00305
Plaintiff:
John Delollis , Tom Holsman , Empire State Carpenters Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Friedberg, Smith & Co PC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
