Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Barnes et al v. Tom Peacock Nissan-Cadillac, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Brandon Barnes and Senrab Services LLC
Defendant:
Tom Peacock Nissan-Cadillac, Inc., Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Trust Financial Corporation/Trust Bank and others
Tom Peacock Nissan/Cadillac, Inc. v. LMP Automotive Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv02194
Plaintiff:
Tom Peacock Nissan/Cadillac, Inc.
Defendant:
LMP Automotive Holdings, Inc., Samer Tawfik and Richard Aldahan
Cross Defendant:
First American Title Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
LMP Automotive Holdings, Inc. v. Tom Peacock Nissan-Cadillac, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv01908
Plaintiff:
LMP Automotive Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Tom Peacock Nissan-Cadillac, Inc., David P. Peacock, Aldo B. Paret and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Samer Tawfik and Richard Aldahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv02821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Martinez v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00214
Plaintiff:
Maritza Martinez
Defendant:
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Nissan North America, Inc. and Tom Peacock Nissan/Cadillac, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bowles v. Tom Peacock Nissan/Cadillac, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv02325
Plaintiff:
Harry Louis Bowles
Defendant:
Tom Peacock Nissan/Cadillac, Inc. and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowles v. Tom Peacock Nissan/Cadillac, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv02273
Defendant:
Tom Peacock Nissan/Cadillac, Inc. and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Harry Louis Bowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv02210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
