Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bentz et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv02892
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bentz , Scott Spires , James Blankenship and others
Defendant:
Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd., Tai'an Taishan Plasterboard Co., Ltd, Beijing New Building Materials Public Limited Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henry v. His Choice Towing and Recovery, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00511
Plaintiff:
Pomdrest J. Henry
Defendant:
His Choice Towing and Recovery, LLC, William Tony Wharton and Pamala Wharton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01388
Plaintiff:
Holly Reed , Timothy Logan , Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Howard v. Broan-NuTone, LLC
as 2:2010cv00195
Plaintiff:
Tony Howard
Defendant:
Broan-NuTone, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Stephens v. IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.
as 1:2008cv02172
Plaintiff:
Tony Wendell Stephens
Defendant:
IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Webster v. Hedediger Enterprises Inc.
as 1:2007cv02823
Plaintiff:
Toni Webster
Defendant:
Hedediger Enterprises Inc. and Hedediger Enterprises Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Indymac Bank, FSB v. American Discount Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00809
Plaintiff:
Indymac Bank, FSB
Defendant:
American Discount Mortgage, Inc., Joseph W. Mills, Toni Peterkin and others
Cross Claimant:
Sean O'Dell
Cross Defendant:
Cedric Alston and CMA Appraisals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
BFS Retail & Commericial Operations, LLC. v. Harrelson
as 5:2007cv00032
Plaintiff:
BFS Retail & Commericial Operations, LLC.
Defendant:
Tony Harrelson
Counter Claimant:
Tony Harrelson
Counter Defendant:
BFS Retail & Commericial Operations, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
