Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Toole v. Spanberger
as 2:2026cv00777
Plaintiff:
Bridget Toole
Defendant:
Abigail Spanberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Toole v. Spanberger
as 2:2026cv00778
Plaintiff:
Bridget Toole
Defendant:
Abigail Spanberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Toole v. Woodard et al
as 2:2026cv00779
Plaintiff:
Bridget Toole
Defendant:
Brett Woodard, General Norfolk Building Inspection and GMG Taylor and Ms. Folks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Cornwell Quality Tools Co. v. Stoecker et al
as 1:2026cv01998
Plaintiff:
Cornwell Quality Tools Co.
Defendant:
Kevin J. Stoecker, Candis M. Stoecker and Stoecker Tool Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Churchill v. Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc et al
as 3:2026cv05747
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Churchill
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. and Harbor Freight Tools Corporate LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
