Cases 11 - 20 of 236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dave Vaccaro v. Westside Investments, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04656
Plaintiff:
Dave Vaccaro
Defendant:
Westside Investments, Inc. doing business as Marina Del Rey Toyota and DOES 1-10 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Eric Malone v. Toyota Motor Sales
as 2:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
Eric Malone
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Jose Javier Perez v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00780
Plaintiff:
Jose Javier Perez
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Toyota Motor Corporation and Southeast Toyota Distributors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Eric Malone v. Toyota Motor Sales
as 5:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Eric Malone
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv09128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
