Cases 11 - 20 of 118
PRINCE et al v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01682
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL J. PRINCE and BELINDA A. PRINCE
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., TOYOTA NORTH AMERICA, INC. and TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MERCADO v. TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. et al
as 1:2021cv13631
Plaintiff:
MARIA ELENA MERCADO
Defendant:
TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. and TOYOTA MOTOR CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv13106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv13106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ARRASMITH v. SHORE TOYOTA et al
as 1:2021cv08786
Defendant:
SHORE TOYOTA, JOHN DOE EMPLOYEES 1-10, SCOTT RICHARDSON and others
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA ARRASMITH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Alban et al v. KAWASAKI KISEN KAISHA LTD et al
as 3:2021cv08852
Plaintiff:
John Levya, Monica Bushey, Sheryl Haley and others
Defendant:
K LINE AMERICA, INC. and KAWASAKI KISEN KAISHA LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Alban et al v. KAWASAKI KISEN KAISHA LTD et al
as 2:2021cv08852
Plaintiff:
John Levya, Monica Bushey, Sheryl Haley and others
Defendant:
K LINE AMERICA, INC. and KAWASAKI KISEN KAISHA LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
SEPULVEDA v. TOYOTA LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05025
Defendant:
LAWRENCE KENDRICK, ZIGGY SLUSARZ, TOYOTA LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
GRICEL SEPULVEDA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03361
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02815
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
