Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv09477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Hickmon v. Fun & Fit LLC et al
as 1:2020cv10270
Defendant:
Fun & Fit LLC doing business as Home Instead Senior Care, Brian Trainor and John Does #1-10
Plaintiff:
Sandra Hickmon
Calvino v. Trainor et al
as 1:2020cv00727
Plaintiff:
Ernest Calvino, Jr.
Defendant:
Megan Trainor Dobles, Refer to D.A. and Megan Trainor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Calvino v. Trainor
as 1:2019cv11668
Plaintiff:
Ernest Calvino, Jr.
Defendant:
Megan Trainor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07194
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Meyers v. Hughes et al
as 2:2018cv04399
Defendant:
Hon Matthew G. Hughes, Ademola Kolawak, Gary Rosenthal and others
Plaintiff:
Arlene Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Meyers v. Hughes et al
as 1:2018cv06737
Defendant:
Hon Matthew G. Hughes, Ademola Kolawak, Gary Rosenthal and others
Plaintiff:
Arlene Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv09553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05580
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
O'Diah v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2016cv01373
Defendant:
American Medical College Application Service, And Association Of American Medical Colleges, And Medical College Admission Test, Anthony J. Annucci, Beckman Coulter, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Aror Ark O'Diah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
