Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Woods v. AFSCME Local Officers Union et al
as 3:2025cv50043
Plaintiff:
Harlis Woods
Defendant:
AFSCME Local Officers Union, Latoya Hughes, Travis Bayler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Bayler et al
as 3:2025cv00060
Defendant:
Travis Bayler, Latoya Hughes and Anthony Wills
Plaintiff:
Jarrod F. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Regan v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01303
Defendant:
Lisa Weitkamp, Mindi Nurse, LaToya Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
John Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Defendant:
The State of Illinois, City Of Dixon, Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorn v. Jeffreys et al
as 4:2023cv04180
Plaintiff:
James Dorn
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Travis Bayler, Mark Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorn v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv03405
Plaintiff:
James Dorn
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Travis Bayler, Mark Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv02856
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jackson
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Chaplain Arnold, C. Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wisnauski v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv02261
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wisnauski
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Travis Bayler, Dr. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smart v. Bayler et al
as 3:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Elliott Smart
Defendant:
Travis Bayler and Rob Jeffreys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
