Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Northwest Pipe Company v. Trinity Highway Products LLC
as 3:2015cv01145
Plaintiff:
Northwest Pipe Company
Defendant:
Trinity Highway Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mehle v. Trinity Highway Products, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00338
Plaintiff:
Michelle Mehle
Defendant:
Trinity Highway Products, LLC and Trinity Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Trinity Highway Products, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00339
Defendant:
Trinity Highway Products, LLC and Trinity Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Evans and Victoria Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elsevier v. Trinity Industries
as 4:2014mc02894
Movant:
Texas A&M Transportation Institute
Plaintiff:
Brian Elsevier
Defendant:
Trinity Industries Inc and Trinity Highway Products LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Washington v. Trinity Industries Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01041
Defendant:
Trinity Industries Inc and Trinity Highway Products, LLC
Plaintiff:
Danielle Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harman v. Trinity Industries Inc et al
as 3:2014mc00084
Plaintiff:
Joshua Harman and United States of America
Defendant:
Trinity Industries Inc and Trinity Highway Products LLC
United States of America (ex rel Joshua Harman) v. Trinity Industries Inc et al
as 2:2014mc00001
Defendant:
Trinity Industries Inc and Trinity Highway Products, LLC
Plaintiff:
United States of America (ex rel Joshua Harman)
Benson v. Trinity Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00746
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Benson
Defendant:
Trinity Industries, Inc. and Trinity Highway Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America ex rel. Joshua Harman v. Trinity Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2013mc00006
Plaintiff:
United States of America (ex rel Joshua Harman)
Defendant:
Trinity Industries Inc and Trinity Highway Products, LLC
Movant:
Texas A&M University System
Cause Of Action: M:08-85q
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
