Cases 1 - 6 of 6
J. B., et al v. James Fassnacht, et al
as -3833
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROLE TROSTLE, individually and in her official capacity as Probation Officer at the Lancaster County Office of Juvenile Probation, DAVID MUELLER, individually and in his official capacity as Probation Officer at the Lancaster County Office of Juvenile Probation, JOSEPH CHOI, individually and in his official capacity as Security Officer at the Lancaster County Youth Intervention Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J. B., A Minor, by Thomas Benjamin and Janet Benjamin, Parents and Natural Guardians, JANET BENJAMIN and THOMAS BENJAMIN
J. B., et al v. James Fassnacht, et al
as 15-3848
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROLE TROSTLE, individually and in her official capacity as Probation Officer at the Lancaster County Office of Juvenile Probation, DAVID MUELLER, individually and in his official capacity as Probation Officer at the Lancaster County Office of Juvenile Probation, JOSEPH CHOI, individually and in his official capacity as Security Officer at the Lancaster County Youth Intervention Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J. B., A Minor, by Thomas Benjamin and Janet Benjamin, Parents and Natural Guardians, JANET BENJAMIN and THOMAS BENJAMIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Texas Tarts, Inc.
as 4:2010cv01581
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Texas Tarts, Inc. and Kristin Trostle
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Trostle et al
as 4:2008cv03292
Defendant:
Kristin Trostle and Texas Tarts, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
