Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00845
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Francis Rozelle, Jr., et al v. John Lowe
as 16-50444
Appellant:
FRANCIS MCQUEEN ROZELLE, JR. and CLARITA SOMMERS JOHNSON
Appellee:
TRUSTEE JOHN PATRICK LOWE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00367
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Francis McQueen Rozelle, Jr., et.al. vs. John Patrick Lowe
as 5:2015mc01108
Notice Only Party:
R. Glen Ayers, Jr., Paul D. Barkhurst, David S. Gragg and others
Debtor:
Clarita Sommers Johnson
Plaintiff:
Clarita Sommers Johnson and Francis McQueen Rozelle, Jr.
Movant:
Local Taxing Jurisdictions and SLF IV UTSA Blvd. Noteholder, L.P.
Defendant:
Trustee John Patrick Lowe
In Re:
Francis McQueen Rozelle, Jr.
Lowe v. Espinoza et al
as 1:2015cv00443
Defendant:
E&S Oilfield Services, LLC, Abel Espinoza, Jr. and Marcos Espinoza
Plaintiff:
Trustee John Patrick Lowe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rozelle, Jr. et al v. Lowe
as 5:2015mc00376
Appellant:
Clarita Sommers Johnson and Francis McQueen Rozelle, Jr.
In Re:
Clarita Sommers Johnson and Francis McQueen Rozelle, Jr.
Appellee:
Trustee John Patrick Lowe
Creditor:
SLF IV - UTSA Blvd Noteholder, L.P., a Texas limited partnership
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00108
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00865
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
