Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Sullivan et al v. M.A.C. Design Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv01846
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary, M.A.C. Design Corp. and Ali Syed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. S & N Builders, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01844
Defendant:
John Doe, Sakander Raja and S & N Builders, Inc.
Plaintiff:
International Masonry Institute, Jeremiah Sullivan, Jeremiah Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. M.B. Din Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01734
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
Mohammed Chatha, Dean Builders Group Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. Mastercraft Masonry I, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01041
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute, Pointers, Cleaners & Caulker, Welfare, Pension & Annuity Funds and others
Defendant:
John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary, Mastercraft Masonry I, Inc. and Louis Tantillo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. Orba Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv06041
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary, Rakesh Kumar and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. Padilla Construction Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03685
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary, Padilla Construction Services, Inc. and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sullivan v. Champion Construction Corp.
as 12-3299
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jeremiah Sullivan, in his fiduciary capacity as a Trustee for the Pointers, Cleaners & Caulkers Welfare, Pension & Annuity Funds, Pointers, Cleaners & Caulkers Welfare, Pension & Annuity Funds, Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund and others
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe Fiduciary
Defendant - Appellant:
Champion Construction Corp. and Herb J. Chan
Trustees of the Bricklayers Local 1 Connecticut Health Fund et al v. Marquis Masonry, LLC
as 3:2012cv01084
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Bricklayers Local 1 Connecticut Health Fund , Trustees of the Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund , Trustees of the International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
Marquis Masonry, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Trustees of the Bricklayers Local 1 Connecticut Health Fund et al v. Wallach
as 3:2012cv01071
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Bricklayers Local 1 Connecticut Health Fund , Trustees of the Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund , Trustees of the International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
Michael Wallach
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Trustees of the Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund et al v. New England Plasterers, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00918
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund , Bricklayers & Trowel Trades International Retirement Savings Plan , Trustees of the International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
New England Plasterers Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
