Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Tunnell et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq01001
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Stephen Tunnell, III and Annette Tunnell
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tunnel IP LLC v. Mitek Corporation
as 1:2021cv05735
Plaintiff:
Tunnel IP LLC
Defendant:
Mitek Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
TUNNELL v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2018cv03483
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Plaintiff:
HARRY TUNNELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Turn-Key Tunneling Inc v. Cromwell Town of
as 1:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
Turn-Key Tunneling Inc
Defendant:
Cromwell Town of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv01261
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Annett Mauer, Ming Ze Ming Ze and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
TUNNELL JR. v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv02275
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
CHARLES F. TUNNELL JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Harry Tunnell v. DOD
as 16-3987
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY TUNNELL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Capitol Tunneling Inc. v. Atlas Construction Company, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00009
Plaintiff:
Capitol Tunneling Inc.
Defendant:
Atlas Excavating Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tunnell v. U.S. Department of Defense
as 1:2014cv00269
Plaintiff:
Harry Tunnell
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
WINN v. TUNNELL et al
as 1:2010cv00562
Defendant:
ALKOTA CLEANING SYSTEM, INC. and THOMAS L. TUNNELL
Plaintiff:
JUNIOUS E. WINN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
