Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Monroe County v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2022cv10088
Plaintiff:
Monroe County
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., AGC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
City of Plantation v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv62535
Plaintiff:
City of Plantation
Defendant:
3M Company, Chemguard, Inc. and Tyco Fire Products LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
City of Plantation v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv62536
Plaintiff:
City of Plantation
Defendant:
3M Company, E.I. Dupont De Nours and Company, The Chemours Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
City of Plantation v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv62534
Plaintiff:
City of Plantation
Defendant:
3M Company, Chemguard, Inc. and Tyco Fire Products LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
City of Plantation v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv62533
Plaintiff:
City of Plantation
Defendant:
3M Company, E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, The Chemours Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
City of Stuart, Florida v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2018cv14430
Defendant:
Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, National Foam, Inc., Chemguard and others
Plaintiff:
City of Stuart, Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthew Duncan v. Tyco Fire Products LP
as 18-13277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS LP
EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01445
Plaintiff:
EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, BUCKEYE FIRE EQUIPMENT CO, CHEMGUARD INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duncan v. Tyco Fire Products LP
as 1:2016cv00916
Plaintiff:
Matthew Duncan
Defendant:
Tyco Fire Products LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
