Cases 51 - 60 of 65
Conti et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv10601
Plaintiff:
William T. Conti and Patricia L. Supple
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A. , Young W. Yu, Yeon O. Yu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv12126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv11474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Halacy et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2012cv11447
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and U.S. Bank N.A.
Plaintiff:
Richard Halacy and Junemarie Halacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Halacy et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 1:2012cv11447
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank and U.S. Bank N.A. as Trustee
Plaintiff:
Richard Halacy and Junemarie Halacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ayer et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv10981
Plaintiff:
Philip Ayer and Mary Kniest-Ayer
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. PMA I Limited Partnership
as 4:2012cv40065
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
PMA I Limited Partnership
Receiver:
David Buddemeyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Verga et al
as 1:2012mc91050
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Laurence Verga
Martins v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2011cv11349
Plaintiff:
Maria Martins
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A. and Allied Home Mortgage Capital Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aguiar et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv10380
Plaintiff:
Valeria Aguiar and Ananias Aguiar
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , Chase Home Finance, LLC , U.S. Bank N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
