Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 963
Hogarth v. Garland
as 21-621
Petitioner: ROBERT GEORGE HOGARTH
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Andoe v. U.S. Secretary of State et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00326
Plaintiff: Johnny Ray Andoe and Ralph Edward Andoe
Defendant: U.S. Secretary of State, U.S. Attorney General, Correctional Corporaton of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ndoma Alfred v. Garland
as 22-1994
Petitioner: LOMANI NDOMA ALFRED
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03600
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Singh v. Garland
as 22-169
Petitioner: GURWINDER SINGH
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Philimon v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01119
Plaintiff: Sabir Philimon
Defendant: United States of America, The U.S. Attorney General, The U.S. District Attorney and others
Mercado Arechiga v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-243
Petitioner: ERICK MERCADO ARECHIGA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petrosyan v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-386
Petitioner: HAMLET PETROSYAN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Andoe v. U.S. Secretary of State et al
as 1:2023cv00267
Petitioner: Johnny R Andoe
Respondent: U.S. Secretary of State, U.S. Attorney General, Idaho Secretary of State and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cerrato-Maradiaga v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-534
Petitioner: ALEX CERRATO-MARADIAGA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?