Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv09548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv08660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Williams v. Radermacher et al
as 1:2009cv00809
Plaintiff:
Jomo Williams
Defendant:
Radermacher, . Wagner, Shlaggel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Du.Merville v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2009cv00651
Petitioner:
Thomson Du.Merville
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, Field Office Direct Western District, New York State and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roach v. U.S. Attorney General. et al et al
as 2:2009cv01471
Plaintiff:
Colin A. Roach
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General. et al and Nassau County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yosef v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2009cv00239
Plaintiff:
Ofer Yosef
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General and Paula Wolff
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Yusov v. Shaughnessy et al
as 1:2009cv00056
Petitioner:
Yuri Yusov
Respondent:
James Shaughnessy, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Dutton v. U.S. Attorney General
as 1:2008cv00874
Petitioner:
Shon C. Dutton
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General; Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
