Cases 1 - 10 of 51
IN RE: APPLICATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR ORDER PURSUANT TO THE TREATY ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 3512
as 1:2024mc21851
Plaintiff:
U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, MIAMI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, MIAMI
as 1:2024mc21750
Plaintiff:
U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, MIAMI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Willy Toussaint v. U.S. Attorney's Office
as 24-10116
Plaintiff:
WILLY TOUSSAINT
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Harold Jean-Baptiste v. United States Department of Justice, et al
as 24-10110
Plaintiff:
HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, DIRECTOR OF F.B. I. and others
Harold Jean-Baptiste v. United States Department of Justice, et al
as 23-14053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Touissant v. U.S. Attorney's Office
as 1:2023cv24624
Plaintiff:
Willy Touissant
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
