Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Chicago Title Land Trust, Trust No. 127632 et al v. Chupack et al
as 1:2022cv00949
Plaintiff:
Chicago Title Land Trust, Trust No. 127632, Robert Anthony Bryant, Ridgeland Corporation and others
Defendant:
Joel Chupack, Bank of America N.A., FDIC, U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. U.S. Bank Trust
as 1:2018cv02008
Plaintiff:
Terrance A Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Love v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.
as 1:2018cv00206
Plaintiff:
Clarisa Love
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Carlos et al v. Beneficial Financial I, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01341
Plaintiff:
Hector M. Carlos and Maria D. Carlos
Defendant:
Beneficial Financial I, Inc., Caliber Home Loans, Inc. and U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lind v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11725
Plaintiff:
Donald Lind
Defendant:
Caliber Home Loans, Inc. and U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trust for LSF MRA REO Trust v. Love et al
as 1:2015cv09044
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trust for LSF6 MRA REO Trust
Defendant:
Clarrisa Love and Glenn Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
