Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv02450
Plaintiff:
Stephan Jones
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Bureau of Prisons, RRC Memphis for BOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Warden/Director Shelby Co Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv02335
Petitioner:
Mars Sunny Webb
Respondent:
Warden/Director Shelby Co Corrections, U.S. Bureau of Prisons, United States Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pettigrew v. Shelby County Correctional Center Warden et al
as 1:2022cv01101
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Pettigrew
Defendant:
Shelby County Correctional Center Warden, U.S. Bureau of Prisons, CCA/Core Logic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettigrew v. Shelby County Correctional Center Warden et al
as 2:2022cv01101
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Pettigrew
Defendant:
Shelby County Correctional Center Warden, U.S. Bureau of Prisons, CCA/Core Logic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Shelby County Corrections Warden et al
as 1:2022cv01064
Petitioner:
Stacy Edwards
Defendant:
Shelby County Corrections Warden, United States District Court, U.S. Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ibrihim v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv02209
Petitioner:
Siraj Ibrihim and Robert Crain
Respondent:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons, United States of America, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ortkiese v. Residential Reentry Manager - Fulqum et al
as 3:2017cv00720
Petitioner:
Joseph Howard Ortkiese
Respondent:
Residential Reentry Manager - Fulqum and U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
