Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv14365
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parrott et al v. Miesels et al
as 3:2018cv00635
Plaintiff:
Joseph Parrott, Sr. and Jo-Lynn J. Parrott
Defendant:
Jonathan Miesels, Jessica Conte, Jennifer Scott Mouser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Davis et al
as 1:2017cv24280
Plaintiff:
British D. Moss
Defendant:
Richard K. Davis, Andrew Cecere, Jennie P. Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Ardis v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 17-14251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Robert Ardis v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 17-14250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
U.S. Bank National Association v. Mines et al
as 3:2016cv01465
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Joseph Washington Mines, Jr., Unknown Spouse of Joseph Washington Mines, Jr., A/K/A Joseph W. Mines, Jr., Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holding, LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
Joseph Washington Mines, Jr.
Counter_defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Antonio Ramos v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 16-16780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO RAMOS
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Ramos v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 0:2016cv60869
Plaintiff:
Antonio Ramos
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Delgado v. Select Portfolio Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv22799
Plaintiff:
Andy Delgado
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Services, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
