Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 207
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35623
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Defendant / Appellant: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, MARY D'AVERSA, in her official capacity as District Manager for the Bureau of Land Management Idaho Falls District and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: P4 PRODUCTION LLC
Kenneth Shade, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 23-35587
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENNETH H. SHADE
Plaintiff: ERIC L. SHADE
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, EUGENE R. PELTOLA, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as Regional Director of the Alaska Region, Bureau of Indian Affairs and DEB HAALAND, individually and in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Kenneth Shade, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 23-35569
Plaintiff / Appellee: KENNETH H. SHADE
Plaintiff: ERIC L. SHADE
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, EUGENE R. PELTOLA, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as Regional Director of the Alaska Region, Bureau of Indian Affairs and DEB HAALAND, individually and in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservati v. J.R. Simplot Company, et al
as 23-35544
Plaintiff / Appellee: SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and LAURA DANIEL-DAVIS, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservati v. USDOI, et al
as 23-35543
Plaintiff / Appellee: SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and LAURA DANIEL-DAVIS, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservati v. J.R. Simplot Company, et al
as 23-80059
Respondent: SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION, LAURA DANIEL-DAVIS, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Not Yet Classified: J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservati v. USDOI, et al
as 23-80058
Respondent: SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION
Petitioner: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and LAURA DANIEL-DAVIS, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management
Not Yet Classified: J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
Emilio Reyes v. USDOI, et al
as 23-55460
Plaintiff / Appellant: EMILIO REYES
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and AMY DUTSCHKE, in her official capacity as Regional Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs Pacific Regional Office
Cascadia Wildlands, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35353
Plaintiff / Appellant: CASCADIA WILDLANDS and KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER
Plaintiff: OREGON WILD
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, an Oregon non-profit corporation and COUNTY OF DOUGLAS
Alaska Wildlife Alliance, et al v. USFWS, et al
as 23-35299
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SHANNON ESTENOZ, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ALASKA OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION and STATE OF ALASKA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?