Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Gunnison County Stockgrowers' Association, Inc. et al v. US Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 1:2023cv03258
Plaintiff:
Gunnison County Stockgrowers' Association, Inc., Colorado Cattleman's Association and Colorado Cattlemen's Association
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams, Colorado Division of Parks and Wildlife and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Defenders of Wildlife, Friends of Animals, WildEarth Guardians and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Rocky Mountain Wild, et al v. Dallas, et al
as 22-1439
Petitioner:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, SAN LUIS VALLEY ECOSYSTEM COUNCIL, SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE and others
Respondent:
DAN DALLAS, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor,, TAMARA WHITTINGTON, in her official capacity as Deputy Regional Forester, BRIAN FEREBEE, in his official capacity as Regional Forester and others
Intervenor:
LEAVELL-MCCOMBS JOINT VENTURE
Rocky Mountain Wild, et al v. Dallas, et al
as 22-1438
Petitioner:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE, SAN LUIS VALLEY ECOSYSTEM COUNCIL and others
Respondent:
DAN DALLAS, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor, BRIAN FEREBEE, in his official capacity as Regional Forester, ANNE TIMBERMAN, in her official capacity as Western Colorado Supervisor and others
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 1:2022cv00796
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 1:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Rocky Mountain Peace & Justice Center, et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al
as 21-1310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN PEACE & JUSTICE CENTER, CANDELAS GLOWS/ROCKY FLATS GLOWS, ROCKY FLATS RIGHT TO KNOW and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
Center for Biological, et al v. Walsh, et al
as 21-1200
Petitioner:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profit organization, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a non-profit organization and HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, a non-profit organization
Respondent:
AURELIA SKIPWIRTH, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the U.S. Fishand Wildlife Service, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, a federal agency, THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and others
Save The Colorado, et al v. Spellmon, et al
as 21-1155
Petitioner / Appellant:
LIVING RIVERS, a nonprofit corporation, THE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, SAVE THE COLORADO, a Colorado nonprofit corporation and others
Respondent / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT GENERAL SCOTT A SPELLMON, in his official capacity as the Chief of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as the Principal Deputy Director, exercising the authority of Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and WIldlife Service and DEBRA HAALAND, in her offical capacity as Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor / Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, acting by and through its Board of Water Commissioners (Denver Water)
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al
as 1:2020cv03580
Defendant:
Vicki Christiansen, Bureau of Land Management, David Bernhardt and others
Plaintiff:
Western Watersheds Project and Center for Biological Diversity
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540
Friends of Animals v. Bernhardt, et al
as 20-1182
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID BERNHARDT and U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
