Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Raissis v. Groves et al
as 1:2011cv03318
Plaintiff:
Michael Raissis
Defendant:
John Groves , U.S. Foodservice, Inc. , Ahmed Yousri-Ahmed Oran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fang v. U.S. Foodservice, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04511
Plaintiff:
Michael Fang
Defendant:
Emanuel Perry and U.S. Foodservice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Freifeld v. U.S. Foodservice, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04297
Defendant:
Antonio M. Castan and U.S. Foodservice, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nicolae Freifeld
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
U.S. Foodservice, Inc. v. Derrigo et al
as 7:2008cv00924
Plaintiff:
U.S. Foodservice, Inc.
Defendant:
Antonio Derrigo, Leon Schwartz, Gabriele Kajdas and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
U.S. Foodservice, Inc. v. Galipeau's Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2008mc00053
Plaintiff:
U.S. Foodservice, Inc.
Defendant:
Galipeau's Enterprises, Inc., Michael P. Galipeau and Jennifer L. Galipeau
U.S. Foodservice, Inc. v. Galipeau's Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00258
Plaintiff:
U.S. Foodservice, Inc.
Defendant:
Galipeau's Enterprises, Inc., Michael P. Galipeau and Jennifer L. Galipeau
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Monaco v. U.S. Foodservice, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01475
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Monaco
Defendant:
U.S. Foodservice, Inc. and Oguguo Jorji
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Thomas & King, Inc. v. Koninklijke Ahold N.V. et al
as 3:2008cv00005
Plaintiff:
Thomas & King, Inc.
Defendant:
Koninklijke Ahold N.V., U.S. Foodservice, Inc., Gordon Redgate and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Catholic Healthcare West v. Koninklijke Ahold N.V. et al
as 3:2008cv00004
Plaintiff:
Catholic Healthcare West, Catholic Healthcare West, Catholic Healthcare West and others
Defendant:
Koninklijke Ahold N.V., U.S. Foodservice Inc, Gordon Redgate and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
