Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Muhammad Akbar, Sr. v. U.S. Parole Commission, et al
as 21-55771
Petitioner / Appellant:
MUHAMMAD JALAL-DEEN AKBAR, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and JENKINS, Warden
Clinton Eldridge v. Barbara von Blanckensee, et al
as 21-15616
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLINTON T. ELDRIDGE
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, Acting Chairman of the U.S. Parole Commission and BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE
Tyrone Hurt v. Board of Parole, et al
as 20-2484
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Parole Commission, et al and D.C. Board of Parole, et al
Tyrone Hurt v. D.C. Board of Parole, et al
as 20-2079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Parole Commission, et al and D.C. Board of Parole, et al
Keith Webb-El v. Thomas Kane, et al
as 19-5229
Defendant / Appellee:
Timothy S. Stewart, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Cumberland, Scott Kubic, Parole Examiner, U.S. Parole Commission, Thomas R. Kane, Deputy Director, U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons, Central Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Keith B. Webb-El
DUFUR v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2018cv02156
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff:
ARTIE DUFUR
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3511
ANDERSON v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv02807
Plaintiff:
MELVIN ANDERSON
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MALLOY v. GRAY et al
as 1:2014cv01007
Plaintiff:
GERALD J MALLOY
Defendant:
VINCENT C. GRAY , D.C. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL , U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Brandon Burnside v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 14-71360
Petitioner:
BRANDON LEE BURNSIDE
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Rodney Browning v. USDC-CALA
as 14-70475
:
In re: RODNEY BROWNING
Petitioner:
RODNEY BROWNING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
RICHARD IVES and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
