Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ALVAREZ v. HOME DEPOT USA INC
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ALVAREZ
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and HOME DEPOT USA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hailes v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 9:2023cv80634
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Hailes
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Worlds v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv01534
Plaintiff:
Elajuwan Jarrod Worlds
Defendant:
CITY OF LAKELAND, A FLORIDA MUNICIPALITY, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., DETECTIVE EDWARD SEALEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 4:2017cv00515
Plaintiff:
SHAWN THOMAS
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Beilfuss v. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.
as 3:2013cv01545
Plaintiff:
Claudia Beilfuss
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Waugh v. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.
as 0:2013cv62573
Plaintiff:
Gosnel Waugh
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bakala v. Home Depot, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv10036
Plaintiff:
Arthur Bakala
Defendant:
Home Depot, Inc., Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and The Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Home Depot U.S.A Inc et al
as 9:2010cv81086
Plaintiff:
Albert M Robinson
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A Inc, Jeffery Sean Hasley, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. City of Houston et al
as 9:2010cv80797
Plaintiff:
Albert M Robinson and Anita Robinson
Defendant:
City of Houston, Houston Police Department, Houston Public Works and Engineering Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Benitez Rionda v. HSBC Bank U.S.A., N.A.
as 1:2010cv20654
Plaintiff:
Tomas Benitez Rionda and Tomas Benitez Rionda
Defendant:
HSBC Bank U.S.A., N.A. and HSBC Bank U.S.A., N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
