Cases 51 - 60 of 162
Golden v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2017at00907
Plaintiff:
Clyde Golden
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Golden v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2017cv01174
Plaintiff:
Clyde Golden
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton v. Behr Process Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv01765
Plaintiff:
Michael Hamilton
Defendant:
Behr Process Corporation, Behr Paint Corporation, Masco Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Janice Huskey v. Behr Process Corp. et al
as 8:2017cv01374
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc., Behr Paint Corp., Masco Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Janice Huskey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brian Warner, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., In
as 17-55892
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIAN WARNER, KENNETH MACLEOD, MICHAEL MEADE and others
Objector - Appellant:
JAMES STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., a California corporation
Brian Warner, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., In
as 17-55890
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIAN WARNER, KENNETH MACLEOD, MICHAEL MEADE and others
Objector - Appellant:
CEMIL HOPE
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., a California corporation
Brian Warner, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., In
as 17-55891
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIAN WARNER, KENNETH MACLEOD, MICHAEL MEADE and others
Objector - Appellant:
GAY HOPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., a California corporation
Christensen v. Huawei Device U.S.A. Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02336
Plaintiff:
Brian Christensen
Defendant:
Huawei Device U.S.A. Inc. and Google Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Matin Shalikar v. Asahi Beer U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2017cv02713
Defendant:
Asahi Beer U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alexander Panvini and Matin Shalikar
Craya C. Caron v. Fletcher Jones Motors Cars Inc et al
as 8:2017cv00565
Plaintiff:
Craya C. Caron
Defendant:
Does, Fletcher Jones Motors Cars Inc and Mercedes-Benz U.S.A., LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
