Cases 11 - 20 of 29
USA vs $196,990.00
as 2:2011cv00169
Plaintiff:
U.S.A.
Defendant:
$196,990.00 In U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
U.S.A. v. 2004 HYUNDAI SANTE FE GL
as 5:2011cv00041
Plaintiff:
U.S.A.
Defendant:
2004 HYUNDAI SANTE FE GL
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
U.S.A. v. THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FORTY-FOUR ($35,644.00) DOLLARS AND NO/100THS
as 5:2011cv00010
Plaintiff:
U.S.A.
Defendant:
THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FORTY-FOUR ($35,644.00) DOLLARS AND NO/100THS
Claimant:
Rafael Nunez-Gandarilla
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5316
U.S.A. v. 2000 FREIGHTLINER CLASSIC XL TRACTOR & 2002 UTILITY FLATBED TRAILER
as 5:2010cv00132
Plaintiff:
U.S.A.
Defendant:
2000 FREIGHTLINER CLASSIC XL TRACTOR & 2002 UTILITY FLATBED TRAILER
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
U.S.A. v. 2001 FORD F150 & 2009 UTILITY GOOSENECK TRAILER
as 5:2010cv00084
Plaintiff:
U.S.A.
Defendant:
2001 FORD F150 & 2009 UTILITY GOOSENECK TRAILER
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1324
U.S.A. v. $2,881.00 United States Currency
as 5:2010cv00029
Plaintiff:
U.S.A.
Defendant:
$2,881.00 United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
U.S.A. v. 2414 BURNSIDE, LAREDO, WEBB COUNTY, TX
as 5:2010cv00014
Plaintiff:
U.S.A.
Defendant:
2414 BURNSIDE, LAREDO, WEBB COUNTY, TX
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
U.S.A. v. $88,000.00 United States Currency
as 5:2009cv00122
Plaintiff:
U.S.A.
Defendant:
$88,000.00 United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5316 Report on Monetary Instruments
U.S.A. v. $191,900.00 United States Currency
as 5:2009cv00121
Plaintiff:
U.S.A.
Defendant:
$191,900.00 United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5316 Report on Monetary Instruments
U.S.A. v. $74,000.00 United States Currency
as 5:2009cv00095
Plaintiff:
U.S.A.
Defendant:
$74,000.00 United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5316 Report on Monetary Instruments
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
