Other Statutes Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 31 - 40 of 50
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. STAPLES, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv02115
Petitioner: DETROIT REGIONAL CHAMBER, RENT-A-CENTER, INC., GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: OFFICE DEPOT, INC. and STAPLES, INC.
Interested Party: JOHN DOE, LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC., NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM and others
Plaintiff: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Intervenor: JOHN DOE CORPORATION III
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AB ELECTROLUX et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01039
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: AB ELECTROLUX, ELECTROLUX NORTH AMERICA, INC. and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Interested Party: BSH HOME APPLIANCES CORPORATION, MIDEA AMERICAN CORPORATION, HOME DEPOT U.S.A. and others
Intervenor: WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC., HAIER AMERICA TRADING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
CERTAIN LITHIUM METAL OXIDE CATHODE MATERIALS, LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES FOR POWER TOOL PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME, AND POWER TOOL PRODUCTS WITH LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES CONTAINING SAME et al v. UMICORE N.V. et al
as 1:2015mc00725
Petitioner: BASF CORPORATION and UCHICAGO ARGONNE LLC
Respondent: UMICORE N.V., UMICORE USA INC, MAKITA CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: MS:MiscOrd
IN RE: CERTAIN STAINLESS STEEL PRODUCTS, CERTAIN PROCESSES FOR MANUFACTURING OR RELATING TO SAME AND CERTAIN PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME
as 1:2015mc00594
Petitioner: VALBRUNA SLATER STAINLESS, INC. , VALBRUNA STAINLESS INC. and ACCIAIERIE VALBRUNA S.P.A.
Respondent: VIRAJ PROFILES LIMITED, VIRAJ U.S.A., INC., FLANSCHENWERK BEBITZ GMBH and others
Cause Of Action: Request for Judicial Assistance
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. (TPUSA) v. BURWELL et al
as 1:2014cv01668
Plaintiff: TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. (TPUSA)
Defendant: SYLVIA M. BURWELL and MARGARET A. HAMBURG
Movant: HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS PLC and WEST-WARD PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
IN RE: CERTAIN TIRES AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME
as 1:2014mc00054
Petitioner: TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD, TOYO TIRE HOLDINGS OF AMERICAS INC., TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP. and others
Respondent: SVIZZ-ONE CORPORATION LTD. , HONG KONG TRI-ACE TIRE CO., LTD., WEIFANG SHUNFUCHANG RUBBER & PLASTIC CO., LTD. and others
CLOVER HOLDINGS, INC. et al v. CANON, INC. et al
as 1:2012mc00312
Respondent: CANON, INC. , CANON U.S.A., INC. and CANON VIRGINIA, INC.
Petitioner: CLOVER HOLDINGS, INC. , CLOVER TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC , CLOVER VIETNAM CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC et al v. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY LTD et al
as 1:2012mc00020
Petitioner: INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC , INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and IPR LICENSING, INC.
Respondent: HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, LTD., FUTUREWEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., NOKIA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Application for Letters Rogatory
INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC et al v. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY LTD et al
as 1:2012mc00019
Petitioner: INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC , INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and IPR LICENSING, INC.
Respondent: HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, LTD., FUTUREWEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., NOKIA CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Application for Letters Rogatory
INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC et al v. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY LTD et al Featured Case
as 1:2012mc00018
Petitioner: INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC , INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and IPR LICENSING, INC.
Respondent: HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, LTD., FUTURE WEI TECHNOLOGIES INC, NOKIA CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Application for Letters Rogatory

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?