Cases 31 - 35 of 35
Beauchamp v. Daimler Chrysler et al
as 2:2009cv15015
Plaintiff:
Loyal Beauchamp
Defendant:
Daimler Chrysler and Chrysler-UAW Pension Board of Administration
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Workers of America, UAW et al v. Clark Equipment Company et al
as 1:2008cv01230
Plaintiff:
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Workers of America, UAW, Duane Hellwig, Ray Kohler and others
Defendant:
Clark Equipment Company, Ingersoll-Rand Company and Doosan Infracore America Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rachilla et al v. Mack Trucks, Incorporated et al
as 1:2008cv14771
Plaintiff:
Martin Rachilla, Joseph E Craig, Jr, John R Wahler and others
Defendant:
Mack Trucks, Incorporated and Mack Trucks, Incorporated Retiree Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Workers of America, UAW et al v. Robert Bosch Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00962
Plaintiff:
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Workers of America, UAW, Local 383 International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Workers of America, UAW, Harry Groth and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch Corporation and Bosch Chassis Division
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Pen Bnft Guar Corp v. Rouge UAW Ret Pln, et al
as 2:2003cv75092
Plaintiff:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Defendant:
Rouge Steel Company Salaried Employee Retirement Plan , Rouge Steel Company UAW Past Service Retirement Plan , Rouge Steel Company Salaried Employee Past Service Retirement Plan and others
Intervenor_defendant:
United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America Local 600 and United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, International Union
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
