Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Haughton v. Saks Fifth Avenue LLC et al
as 1:2018cv12108
Defendant:
John Does/Jane Does unidentified employees/security guards/loss prevention, asset prevention agents whose names are fictitious true names unknown intended to be agents, servants and/or employees of Sa, P.O. Hall, P.O Beaty and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Haughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chmil v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2017cv05459
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Chmil
Defendant:
County of Nassau, Nassau County District Attorney's Office, Nassau County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nguembou v. Saks Fifth Avenue LLC, et al
as 1:2016cv02118
Defendant:
Saks Fifth Avenue LLC, Unidentified Employees, Security Guards and/or Loss Prevention Agents Designated as John Does #1 & 2 and Saks Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Jovite Nguembou
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Griffin et al v. Incorporated Village of Rockville Centre et al
as 2:2014cv04491
Defendant:
Thomas Bunting, Daniel Casella, John Gooch and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Griffin, Craig Griffin, Lance Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Application of SEBASTIAN CANALE VALENTE, Petitioner, for an Order Directing Discovery from MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., and Affiliates, and from MONIQUE JEFFERSON and other employees v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., MERRIL
as 1:2012mc00229
Plaintiff:
Application of SEBASTIAN CANALE VALENTE, Petitioner, for an Order Directing Discovery from MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., and Affiliates, and from MONIQUE JEFFERSON and other employees
Defendant:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., MONIQUE JEFFERSON, MARK BANCROFT, MARCI CARRETO, and John Does 1 through 5 Who are as yet Unidentified Employees of Said Entiti
Cause Of Action: M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
