Cases 21 - 30 of 255
Mustafanos v. Department of Veterans Affairs, et al.
as 3:2022cv00542
In Re:
Yosef Leroi Mustafanos
Petitioner:
Yosef L. Mustafanos
Respondent:
Reno Veterans Administration Medical Center and Department of Veterans Affairs
Defendant:
Veterans Administration Sierra Nevada Health Care System and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Williams v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv01921
Plaintiff:
John T Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Tutankhaman v. Lewis et al
as 2:2022cv01865
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
Nigel Lewis, Tamara Tolbert, Christopher Reed and others
Denning et al v. United States
as 3:2022ms00007
Petitioner:
David Denning and Valerie V. Denning
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Denning et al v. United States
as 3:2022cv00467
Petitioner:
David Denning and Valerie V. Denning
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moreno v. United States Government
as 3:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Moreno
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tutankhaman v. United States District Court
as 2:2022cv01503
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
United States District Court
Nelson v. United States Government
as 3:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
Robert Lillburn Nelson, III
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tutankhaman v. United States Marshall
as 2:2022cv01526
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
United States Marshall
Tutankhaman v. United States Secret Service
as 2:2022cv01527
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman, Grand Royal Prince Michael Dumpledore III and Michael Maxwell Hill
Defendant:
United States Secret Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.