Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 38
PNC Bank et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00374
Plaintiff: PNC Bank National Association
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Little Calumet River Basin Development Commission and Walsh Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Appvion, Inc. v. George A. Whiting Paper Compan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2522
Plaintiff: NCR CORPORATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: APPVION, INCORPORATED, formerly known as APPLETON PAPERS INC.
Defendant - Appellee: GEORGE A. WHITING PAPER COMPANY, PH GLATFELTER COMPANY, MENASHA CORPORATION and others
NCR Corporation v. George A. Whiting Paper Compan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2447
Plaintiff - Appellant: NCR CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee: GEORGE A. WHITING PAPER COMPANY, PH GLATFELTER COMPANY, MENASHA CORPORATION and others
Sales v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 3:2013cv00533
Plaintiff: Tommy Sales
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1101 Violation of Maritime Regulations
HOOSIER ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL et al v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 1:2013cv00317
Defendant: THOMAS P BOSTICK, LUKE T. LEONARD and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Plaintiff: CITIZENS FOR APPROPRIATE RURAL ROADS and HOOSIER ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
Intervenor Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
State of Michigan, et al v. United States Army Corps of En, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3800
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF WISCONSIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO
Intervenor - Appellee: CITY OF CHICAGO, COALITION TO SAVE OUR WATERWAYS and WENDELLA SIGHTSEEING COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Hoosier Environmental Council, et al v. United States Army Corps of En, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3187
Plaintiff - Appellant: HOOSIER ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL and CITIZENS FOR APPROPRIATE RURAL ROADS
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, MERIDITH W. B. TEMPLE, Major General, Acting Commander and Acting Chief Engineer, United States Army Corps of Engineers and LUKE T. LEONARD, Colonal, Commander and District Engineer, United States Army Corp of Engineers, Louisville Division
HOOSIER ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL et al v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 1:2011cv01387
Plaintiff: CITIZENS FOR APPROPRIATE RURAL ROADS and HOOSIER ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
Defendant: COLONEL LUKE T. LEONARD, MAJOR GENERAL MEREDITH W.B. TEMPLE and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HOOSIER ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL et al v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00202
Plaintiff: CITIZENS FOR APPROPRIATE RURAL ROADS and HOOSIER ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
Intervenor Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Defendant: COL. KEITH A LANDRY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and LT. GEN. ROBERT L VAN ANTWERP
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Michigan, et al v. United States Army Corps of E, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-3891
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF WISCONSIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO
Intervenor: CITY OF CHICAGO, COALITION TO SAVE OUR WATERWAYS and WENDELLA SIGHTSEEING COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff - Intervenor: GRAND TRAVERSE BAND OF OTTAWA AND CHIPPEWA INDIANS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?