Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 5:2010cv00194
Petitioner:
CORNELIUS DEWAYNE TAYLOR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grant v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2010cv02206
Petitioner:
Domonick B. Grant
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dennis v. Haynes et al
as 2:2010cv00070
Petitioner:
Lonnie Dennis
Respondent:
Anthony Haynes, United States Bureau of Prisons and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frank v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2010cv01169
Petitioner:
Brian Frank
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Darius Gardner v. Loren Grayer, et al
as 10-10466
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARIUS G. GARDNER
Respondent - Appellee:
LOREN A. GRAYER and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Embry v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2009cv02582
Petitioner:
Bruce Wayne Embry
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons and Loren A. Grayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Type:
Other Statutes
Gardner v. Grayer et al
as 1:2009cv02472
Petitioner:
Darius G. Gardner
Respondent:
Loren A. Grayer and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Type:
Other Statutes
Canword v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2009cv60241
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Canword
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Floyd v. United States of America et al
as 6:2009cv00245
Petitioner:
Franklin Delano Floyd
Respondent:
United States of America and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
