Cases 31 - 40 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11842
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv08979
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05683
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
FINACLE SOFT, INC. v. ZUCHOWSKI et al
as 3:2020cv01564
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Acting Secretary CHAD WOLF and others
Plaintiff:
FINACLE SOFT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv21286
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY & IMMIGRATION ADN CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT AGENCY et al
as 2:2019cv18666
Defendant:
XYZ CORP 1-10, JOHN 1 - 10 DOES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY & IMMIGRATION ADN CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
MS. TARAH N DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00986
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
DEGIRONIMO et al v. UNITED STATE OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2018cv14594
Defendant:
ERNEST RIVERA, MICHAEL A. PAPAGNI, JOHN DOE 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
DIANA CIFUENTES and VITO DEGIRONIMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALEXANDER v. DECKER et al
as 2:2018cv13149
Respondent:
THOMAS DECKER, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III and others
Petitioner:
ERRON ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
