Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00845
Plaintiff:
Emilio Estevez
Defendant:
Samantha Power, Attorney General Merrick Garland, Jason M. Frierson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Live Ventures, Incorporated et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 2:2022cv00832
Plaintiff:
Live Ventures, Incorporated and Juan Camilo Yunis Botero
Defendant:
United States Department of State, Antony J. Blinken, United States Embassy in Colombia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Stanley v. United States Department of State
as 2:2018cv01347
Plaintiff:
Eva Maria Stanley
Defendant:
United States Department of State
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
