Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Jose Leon v. USA, et al
as 22-1770
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE I. LEON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, C.I.A. Headquarters and others
William White v. DOJ, et al
as 21-1229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Robert Kowalski v. USMS, et al
as 20-3511
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT M. KOWALSKI
Robert Kowalski v. USMS, et al
as 20-3482
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Petitioner:
ROBERT M. KOWALSKI
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Passport Agency, et al
as 20-2429
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM S. DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Melvin Bell v. USMS, et al
as 20-1580
Petitioner / Appellant:
MELVIN T. BELL
Respondent / Appellee:
R. A. HEISNER and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Melvin Bell v. USMS, et al
as 20-8008
Respondent:
R. A. HEISNER and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Petitioner:
MELVIN T. BELL
William J. Mabie v. USMS
as 18-2580
Petitioner:
WILLIAM J. MABIE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Lefloris Lyon v. USA, et al
as 17-2675
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEFLORIS LYON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, and its subordinate bureau and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Lefloris Lyon v. USA, et al
as 17-2279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEFLORIS LYON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, and its subordinate bureau and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
