Cases 41 - 50 of 59
James Barclay v. City of Santa Ana California et al
as 8:2013cv00668
Plaintiff:
James Barclay
Defendant:
City of Santa Ana California, County of San Bernardino CA, Dr Wolf and others
Jose Manuel Chacon v. United States Marshals Service
as 2:2013cv00417
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Chacon
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Kelly v. Brown
as 2:1992cv05420
Respondent:
Jill L Brown
Unknown:
Bureau of Prisons, Death Penalty H/C Law Clerks and United States Marshall Service Los Angeles
Petitioner:
Horace Edward Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Mark Steele v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv04760
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, Herninia Galang and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Mark Steele
Gregory Lee McCall v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2012cv03340
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, John Jane Doe, United States Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee McCall
Estate of Dominic Salazar et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv10279
Defendant:
Jason Dipaolo, Jason Dipaolo, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Dominic Salazar and Mary Salazar
Dobrowski v United States Marshals Service
as 2:2011cv02835
Plaintiff:
Justin Dobrowski
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Dobrowski v United States Marshals Service
as 2:2011at01534
Plaintiff:
Justin Dobrowski
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Perroton v. Smith et al
as 3:2011cv03035
Petitioner:
Jon Robert Perroton
Respondent:
Laurie Smith and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hollins v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2011cv02108
Petitioner:
Michael Hollins
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshal Service and Gregory J. Ahern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
