Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Sinkfield v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2019cv00392
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Armond Budish, Kenneth Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice J. Sinkfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02136
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. Greene et al
as 4:2018cv00884
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Jerry Greene, Deputy Johnson, Deputy Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Cocas et al
as 4:2017cv01512
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Donovan Cocas, Adrian N. Roe, McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Roe et al
as 4:2017cv01258
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Evans, Jr. v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 1:2015cv00677
Petitioner:
William Evans, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Marshal Service and Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Picone v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 4:2015cv02047
Plaintiff:
Adam Picone
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service and Northeast Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ealy v. Barrett et al
as 3:2015cv00351
Petitioner:
Lance Ealy
Respondent:
Barrett, United States Marshall Service and Sherrif Richard Jones - Butler County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Picone v. United States Marshal Service, et al.
as 4:2015cv02033
Plaintiff:
Adam Picone
Defendant:
Northeast Ohio Correctional Center and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. United States Marshal Service, et al
as 1:2014cv00912
Petitioner:
William H. Evans, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Marshal Service and Warden, Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
